Last night I saw the netflix special "Inside," by Bo Burnham. I was expecting a fun comedy ride with a few jokes and songs. What I got was a somber, cynical, and dark chastisement of modern online culture as it relates to how it interacts with the real world. It totally blindsided me, so I'm using this journal to sort through my thoughts a bit.
Burnham effectively used this lock-down isolation and depression of the modern world to create a video essay, and the thesis was basically this: the world is in such a terrible state today that it would be egotistical and borderline irresponsible to believe that jokes would solve anything. He sets this out straight away in one of the first songs, and the tone is immediately sardonic and quite bitter that anyone could think comedy really has a place in trying to "heal the world." What follows are a series of scathing songs and monologues that act as an indictment against comedy being used in any way other than to point out the deeply rooted problems, corruption, and hypocrisy of the world. While I absolutely agree that this is one of the main uses for comedy, I disagree that levity has become useless.
That's where his thesis fails. He has fallen so deeply into despair that he no longer holds out hope that comedy would be able to uplift anyone's spirit. Comedy is one of the strongest tools humans have to combat the evils of the world around us, and if done right, telling jokes can defuse even the worst of situations, stripping them of their emotional power over us. You can and should make jokes at everything, maybe not all the time, but nothing should be off the table. To say that an entire era has arrived that should no longer include comedy for the sake of making others happy... that is a depressive trap. It's also an outlook that I think could spread. In fact, I felt it when I watched this show. It was like this man had remotely inflicted an emotional wound on me. That's why I think this should not be listed under "stand up comedy." It would probably be more accurate to label it as "art house performance" or something similar. Make no mistake, people should watch it, but they should be prepared for what's about to happen, even before hitting that 'play' button. Maybe that was intentional. He knows everyone was waiting for him to return to comedy, and while he *did* give a bit of warning at the start, it was in no way enough to represent what was about to happen. Maybe that was part of the point: to lower the viewers' guard, and then make us all feel as hopeless and broken as he felt while making it.
As for the artist himself, he absolutely poured all of his heart and soul into this work, completely unfiltered and unflinching, but it seems that instead of finding a truth of the world, he ultimately just ended up sinking deeper into darkness, seemingly to the point of giving up entirely. I hope I'm wrong, and he was just working through his emotions, getting it all out of his system. I hope he didn't end up ruining himself by diving too deep. Toward the end he straight up stated, "YOU try telling jokes without an audience laughing," and I think maybe he touched on something. He's been bringing joy to his audience for a while now, and maybe it's time that his audience return the favor. While comedy will not heal the world, it can sure as Hell lighten the mood, and I think he probably needs it.
Or maybe not. Maybe I just fell for a convincing performance. Is that too cynical? Then let me rephrase it. Maybe he knew that people needed to realize they are not alone in being negatively effected by the current string of world problems, and that it can take it's toll on anyone, even the jesters of the world. Or maybe it was a combination of all of those reasons, that one and those listed above. Dunno.